Frankly, I’m surprised that US broadcasters haven’t gravitated to it like various other broadcasters around the world – especially for cutting news stories. It’s also perfect for non-broadcast event coverage. That makes it a natural in broadcast news, promos, and sports. Want to cut 4K ProResHQ on a two-year-old MacBook Pro? Then FCPX shines. It handles media better than any other NLE without the need for the beefiest hardware. If you have to get done quickly – from ingest to delivery – then FCPX is hard to beat. The biggest differentiator is turnaround time.
#Final cut pro x cost pro
Final Cut is clearly the better tool in many situations and here’s a quick overview why I feel that way.įinal Cut Pro X is capable of handling all types of editing, but it’s more ideal for some than others. In the past eight years, Apple has added wide codec support, LUTs, HDR capabilities, vastly improved color correction tools, and an easy method of working with captioning. If you were one of those FCP7 users who jumped ship to another tool, then maybe it’s time to revisit Final Cut Pro X. While largely invisible to many US viewers, major international productions, on par with Game of Thrones, have been edited using Final Cut Pro X. Hollywood studios films are dominated by films cut with Avid Media Composer however, short films cut using FCPX have won the short film Oscar category for two years in a row. You are probably aware of Focus and Whiskey Tango Foxtrot, but there are certainly others that have used FCPX. Nevertheless, these types of productions give any product street cred. I realize that winning Oscars and cutting large-scale productions isn’t what the majority of editors do. Modern editors need to be NLE-multilingual. Although my daily workflow is largely Premiere Pro-based now, I regularly use Final Cut Pro X when appropriate, as well as Blackmagic Design DaVinci Resolve and Avid Media Composer. Since then, I have also used it on plenty of spots and corporate videos. I cut a feature film with it back in the pre-10.1 days when it was a bifurcated application with separate Event and Project files.
I have certainly gone back and forth in my own use of FCPX, depending on whether it was the right tool for a given job. In the eight years that have followed, the user base has grown to more than 2.5 million (April 2018) and the application sports the widest third-party support of any editing software. That’s a shame, because FCPX wasn’t a bad design when released – merely incomplete. Many staunch Final Cut Pro (“legacy”) users were irrevocably alienated. While Final Cut Pro X may have ultimately landed in the market sector that Apple envisioned, the industry widely acknowledged that the original launch could have been better managed.
0 kommentar(er)
